Pogonomyrmex mendozanus Cuezzo and Claver 2009

 

Pogonomyrmex mendozanus Cuezzo and Claver, 2009: 101, figs. 1, 2, 5-11 (worker, queen, male). Holotype worker: not examined [IADIZA], ARGENTINA, Mendoza: Departamento Santa Rosa, Ñancuñán (S. Claver leg., 12 Feb. 1997).

 

Pogonomyrmex pronotalis: Claver & Fowler 1993: 191 (nec Santschi); Pirk et al., 2004: 65 (nec Santschi); Pirk & Lopez de Casenave 2006: 119 (nec Santschi); Pirk, et al., 2007: 1092 (nec Santschi); Pol & Lopez de Casenave 2004: 647 (nec Santschi); Pol, et al., 2008: 92 (nec Santschi); Pirk, et al., 2009: 908 (nec Santschi).

 

Worker

Diagnosis.  Within the P. laticeps-group, the combination of: (1) head and mesosoma black, gaster a dark ferruginous orange, and (2) head and mesosoma covered by fine, regular rugae uniquely characterize this species.

Measurements - (n = 16). HL 1.65-2.04; HW 1.87-2.28; MOD 0.37-0.49; OMD 0.47-0.67; SL 1.25-1.59; PNW 1.20-1.41; HF 1.79-2.28; ML 2.16-2.58; PW 0.49-0.67: PPW 0.65-0.82.  Indices: SI 65.45-75.66; CI 102.50-113.33; OI 20.27-23.04; HFI 94.14-106.95.  See also Cuezzo & Claver (2009).

Description. Head slightly to moderately wider than long (CI = 102.50-113.33), widest just posterior to eyes; posterior margin flat to weakly concave in full-face view.  Dorsal surface of head with fine, regular, longitudinal cephalic rugae, in full-face view median rugae diverging weakly toward posterior corners of head.  In side view, rugae posterior to eyes converging toward vertex; vertex rugose.  Cephalic interrugal spaces appearing as furrows, weakly to moderately coriarious, weakly shining.  Anterior margin of clypeus weakly to moderately concave; dorsal surface with numerous subparallel longitudinal rugae.  Mandible with six teeth; mandibular dorsum coarsely striated.  Numerous long, curved, bristle-like, yellowish to brownish hairs project from anterior margin of clypeus and basolateral margin of mandibles.  MOD ranging from 0.20-0.25x HL.  Eyes in profile situated near middle of head, OMD = 1.24–1.43x MOD.  Antennal scapes relatively long (SI = 65.45-75.66), reaching vertex or failing to reach vertex by less than length of basal funicular segment; often with moderately coarse longitudinal striae.  Basal flange of scape flattened with carinate margin.  Psammophore well developed.

Promesonotal profile flattened to weakly irregular, propodeum descending; all mesosomal surfaces with prominent subparallel/parallel sculpturing similar to that on dorsum of head.  In side and dorsal views, humeral shoulders angulate, distinctly elevated above medial portion of pronotum.  Dorsum of promesonotum with longitudinal rugae that diverge anteriorly toward humeral angles; anterior margin of pronotum with transverse rugae that traverse posteroventrally or obliquely on pronotal sides.  Mesopleura with transverse rugae, those near dorsal margin often traversing posterodorsally.  Dorsum and sides of propodeum with transverse rugae.  Superior spines on propodeum long, acuminate; spines longer than width between bases.  Inferior propodeal spines absent or reduced to indistinct broadly rounded process.  Propodeal spiracles narrowly ovate.  Interrugal spaces on mesosoma weakly coriarious, weakly shining to shining.  Legs moderately coriarious, weakly shining.

Petiolar peduncle slightly shorter than petiole, anteroventral margin usually smooth, lacking tooth or lobe.  In side view, petiolar node broadly but asymmetrically rounded with anterior surface shorter than posterior surface.  Apex of node weakly angulate to rounded.  In dorsal view, petiolar node longer than wide, widest anteriorly with spatulate anterior margin; dorsum with numerous fine transverse to arc-shaped wavy striae that curve posteroventrally on sides.  Dorsum of postpetiole convex in profile; in dorsal view, widest near posterior margin, narrowing to anterior margin; maximal width about equal to length; dorsum and sides with numerous transverse wavy striae that are weaker, more closely spaced than on petiole.  Interrugal spaces on petiole and post-petiole weakly to moderately punctate or coriarious, weakly shining to shining.  Dorsum of gaster weakly to moderately coriarious, weakly shining to shining.

      Erect white pilosity moderately abundant on head, variable in length, longest hairs not exceeding MOD.  Moderately abundant suberect to semidecument pilosity on scape, abundant decumbent hairs on funicular segments.  Legs with moderately abundant suberect white setae.  Mesosoma, petiole, postpetiole with moderately dense erect white setae, often similar in length, longest on pronotum, none exceeding MOD; gastral terga with moderately dense pilosity, only those on posterior gastral terga approaching MOD.  Head, mesosoma black; petiole dark orangish-brown to orangish-black; postpetiole, gaster lighter orangish-brown; mandibles, circumference of eyes, tarsi often dark reddish-brown.

      Brachyterous Queen

Diagnosis.  This caste is diagnosed by: (1) brachypterous, (2) in dorsal view, mesoscutum poorly developed, anterior margin barely surpassing humeral shoulders, (3) in lateral view, pronotum meeting mesoscutum at a shallow angle (approximately 45o), and (4) fine, regular, longitudinal rugae on head, mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, transverse rugae on pronotum.

Measurements - (n = 1). HL 2.53; HW 2.81; MOD 0.53; OMD 0.81; SL 1.74; PNW 1.68; HFL 2.48; ML 2.76; PW 0.77; PPW 1.05.  Indices: SI 61.92; CI 111.07; OI 18.86; HFI 88.26.  See also Cuezzo & Claver (2009).

Ergatoid Queen

Diagnosis.

Measurements –

Description.  

      Male

Diagnosis.  This caste is diagnosed by: (1) first gastral tergum lacking striae, (2) subparallel rugae prominent on head and mesosoma, and (3) rugae forming circumocular whorls posterior to eyes.

      Measurements - (n = 12). HL 1.27-1.67; HW 1.44-1.68; MOD 0.46-0.56; OMD 0.23-0.40; SL 0.37-0.56; HFL 1.53-2.19; ML 2.47-2.91; PW 0.50-0.60; PPW 0.70-0.79.  Indices: SI 23.42-34.15; CI 98.16-113.39; OI 29.34-33.94; HFI 106.25-133.54.

Additional material examined. ARGENTINA: Mendoza: Reserva Nancuñan, 1800’, Dec. 12, 2003 (RAJC; CASC); 115.0 km S Jct Rts 7 & 153, 1730’, Jan. 23, 2008 (RAJC); 138.1 km S Jct Rts 7 & 153, 1690’, Jan. 23, 2008 (RAJC); 22.1 km S Jct Rts 7 & 153, 1900’, Jan. 23, 2008 (RAJC); 38.4 km S Jct Rts 7 & 153, 1870’, Jan. 23, 2008 (RAJC); Rt 171 at 15.0 km SE Monte Coman, 1700’, Jan. 27, 2008 (RAJC); Rt 7 at 10.3 km E La Paz, 1540’, Jan. 23, 3008 (RAJC); Rt 7 at 9.8 km E La Dormida, 1720’, Jan. 23, 2008 (RAJC); Rt 7 at 29.8 km E La Dormida, 1610’, Jan. 23, 2008 (RAJC); Rt 7 at 5.8 km W Desaguadero, 1530’, Dec. 28, 2005 (RAJC); 20 mi SE Mendoza, Dec. 26, 2006 (CSC); 8.5 km NW Real de Padre, Nov. 22, 2005 (CSC). San Juan: Nueva Castilla, Dec. 1964 (MZUSP); Pie de Palo, Mar. 11, 1920 (LACM).

Etymology.  The specific epithet, mendozanus (Latinization of Mendoza), is derived from the type locality occurring in Mendoza Province, Argentina.

 

Discussion.  Pogonomyrmex mendozanus was misidentified as P. pronotalis in a list of ant species in Ñancuñan Biosphere Reserve (Claver & Fowler, 1993), and in subsequent publications (see above) until it was described by Cuezzo & Claver (2009).  However, these two species are easily separated with coloration one of few characters shared by both species.  In describing P. mendozanus, Cuezzo & Claver (2009) listed several characters to distinguish it from P. pronotalis.  Sculpturing on the head and mesosoma is the best character: sculpturing on P. mendozanus is relatively fine and very regular, whereas it is irregular on P. pronotalis. 

The fine, very regular sculpturing on the head and mesosoma of P. mendozanus is also unique among all other congeners in Argentina, such that it is difficult to misidentify P. mendozanus.  Pogonomyrmex granulatus and P. catanlilensis are the only congeners that might be confused with P. mendozanus because of their similar coloration.  Both species are diagnosed by: (1) irregular sculpturing on head and mesosoma, and (2) very fine striae on first gastral tergum.  In P. mendozanus, sculpturing on the head and mesosoma is very fine and regular, and the first gastral tergum lacks striae. 

REFERENCES

Claver, S. & Fowler, H.G. (1993) The ant fauna (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of the Ñancuñan Biosphere Reserve. Naturalia, Sao Paulo, 18, 189-193.

Cuezzo, F. & Claver, S. (2009) Two new species of the ant genus Pogonomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 68, 97-106.

Pirk, G.I. & Lopez de Casenave, J. (2006) Diet and seed removal rates by the harvester ants Pogonomyrmex rastratus and Pogonomyrmex pronotalis in the central Monte desert, Argentina. Insectes Sociaux, 53, 119-125.

Pirk, G.I., Lopez de Casenave, J. & Marone, L. (2007) Evaluation of three techniques for the study of harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex spp.) diet. Environmental Entomology, 36, 1092-1099.

Pirk, G.I., Lopez de Casenave, J. & Pol, R.G. (2004) Asociación de las hormigas granívoras Pogonomyrmex pronotalis, P. rastratus y P. inermis con caminos en el Monte central. Ecología Austral, 14, 65-76.

Pirk, G.I., Lopez de Casenave, J., Pol, R.G., Marone, L. & Milesi, F.A. (2009) Influence of temporal fluctuations in seed abundance on the diet of harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) in the central Monte desert, Argentina. Austral Ecology, 34, 908-919.

Pol, R.G. & Lopez de Casenave, J. (2004) Activity patterns of harvester ants Pogonomyrmex pronotalis and Pogonomyrmex rastratus in the Central Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Insect Behavior, 17, 647-661.

Pol, R.G., Lopez de Casenave, J., Feldhaar, H., Milesi, F.A. & Gadau, J. (2008) Polyandry in two South American harvester ants. Insectes Sociaux, 55, 91-97.