Abstracts: October 2003 , Volume 49, Number 4

Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2003). Identification of Aggressive and Asocial Victims and the Stability of Their Peer Victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 401-425.

Abstract:
Despite the awareness that victims of peer aggression are a behaviorally heterogeneous group of children, current classification procedures limit the number of variables that may be used to identify victim subtypes. Findings from this study, which followed 379 racially diverse children (50% female) from kindergarten to 3rd grade, demonstrated the utility of cluster analysis to classify children using several criteria: teacher-rated aggressiveness and asocial tendencies and self-reported peer victimization. Specifically, four subtypes of victims were identified: nonaggressive nonasocial; aggressive; asocial; and both aggressive and asocial. Group differences in the stability of victimization are discussed. Moreover, early levels of aggression predicted increases in victimization and chronicity; the role of asocial behavior was less clear. While more aggressive victims were rejected by their peers than nonaggressive nonasocial victims, victims who were rejected, regardless of behavioral tendencies, were more likely to remain victimized than their better accepted counterparts. Developmental trends are discussed.

Return to table of contents


Sandstrom, M. J. & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Sociometric Status and Children's Peer Experiences: Use of the Daily Diary Method. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 427-452.

Abstract:
Elementary school children completed a daily diary indicating specific peer encounters that had occurred that day at school and participated in sociometric surveys. Diary items assessed three categories of negative peer encounters (physical victimization, social victimization, exclusion) and two categories of positive encounters (positive interactions, participation in activities). Psychometric analyses supported the distinction of these categories. Children's reports of negative peer experiences were associated with their reputations as assessed by sociometric nominations (i.e., low social preference, aggression, withdrawal, and low leadership). Children who were poorly liked or viewed as exhibiting undesirable characteristics encountered more peer mistreatment, while children who were well liked or viewed as exhibiting positive characteristics encountered less. Children's reports of positive encounters were not associated with their social reputations. Consistent with the premise that aggressive-rejected children experience a "kinder" social context than their less aggressive counterparts, aggressive-rejected boys reported fewer instances of negative treatment than withdrawn-rejected boys.

Return to table of contents


Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (2003). Aggressors, Victims, and Defenders in Preschool: Peer, Self-, and Teacher Reports. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 453-469.

Abstract:
Agreement between peer, self-, and teacher nominations for aggressor, victim, and defender and the stability of peer and self-nominations over 4 months was examined. Informants varied in the prominence given to the different roles. Agreement was generally highest for aggressor, between peers and self for victim and defender, and between teacher and peers for aggressor. Classmates were most consistent in nominating aggressors, which showed high stability. Children were more likely to nominate children they liked most for any role and gave their friends more victim nominations. Self-nominations were low for aggressor but higher for defender and victim. Teacher nominations were highest for aggressor. Results are discussed in relation to the development and assessment of the roles.

Return to table of contents


Braswell, G. S. & Callanan, M. A. (2003). Learning to Draw Recognizable Graphic Representations During Mother-Child Interactions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 471-494.

Abstract:
The present study investigated the role of mother-child collaborative drawing in children's creations of recognizable representations. Thirty-two 4- and 5-year-olds played a cooperative game with their mothers in which they were instructed to take turns drawing pictures of farm animals for the other to guess. Mothers and children often talked about their drawings, and many aspects (e.g., discussing features essential for identifying referents) of these conversations were related to microgenetic changes (over the course of the game) in the sophistication of children's pictures. Children also appropriated features from their mothers' drawings into their own drawings over the course of the game. This was particularly the case for "rudimentary" drawers. Results demonstrate that young children learn to create graphic representations through utilizing information from their mothers' drawings and from conversations with their mothers about drawings, although the extent of children's learning is related also in part to their level of drawing performance.

Return to table of contents


Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Clark, R. (2003). Breastfeeding, Bonding, and the Mother-Infant Relationship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 495-517.

Abstract:
Mothers often report that breastfeeding is an enjoyable and emotionally beneficial experience they share with their infants. However, little research has investigated the role of feeding method in the development of the maternal bond and the mother-infant relationship. This study tested two hypotheses-the bonding hypothesis and the good-enough caregiver hypothesis-regarding the association of breastfeeding with maternal bonding and the mother-infant relationship. Using data from a longitudinal study of 570 mother-infant pairs, bonding and the quality of the mother-infant relationship were measured at 4 and 12 months. Although breastfeeding dyads tended to show higher quality relationships at 12 months, bottlefeeding dyads did not display poor quality or precarious relationships. Such results are encouraging for nonmaternal caregivers and mothers who bottlefeed their children.

Return to table of contents

Home | About MPQ | Editors | Subscribe | Manuscript Submission | Archive | Contact Us