
Journal of Basic
Writing
Volume 22 Issue 2,
Fall 2003
Table of Contents
Journal of Basic Writing
Abstracts, volume 22
Issue 2, fall 2003
Hannah Ashley and
Katy Lynn
Ventriloquism
001: How to Throw Your Voice in the
Academy
This article sketches an operationalization of Bakhtinian voicing theory—a practical method of reading that we call "hearing voices." It also connects this method to service learning and other pedagogies that invite "private" voices into the classroom. Reported discourse is at the center of the technique, and we suggest that its significance relates to the types of speakers students are allowed to report and what they are reported as saying. Therefore, a taxonomy for categorizing reported discourse is offered—popular, scholarly and private reported voices. A reading of one student paper is presented, where focusing on reported discourse allows us to hear the different discourses around racism which emerge and the ways that the student gives voice to them and to herself in relation to them. We conclude by suggesting further ways to integrate "hearing voices" into the basic writing classroom.
Thomas
Peele and Mary Ellen Ryder
Belief
Spaces and the Resistant Writer: Queer
Space in the Contact Zone
In
this essay we offer a method of textual analysis that we call the
identification of belief spaces. The concept of belief spaces is adapted from
work in linguistics on mental spaces.
Belief spaces are represented in a student’s text by phrases such as
"I think that" or "for many people today." In the first
example, the belief space represented is the writer’s; this is signaled by her
inclusion of the pronoun "I." In the second example, the belief space
represented is that of "many people"; whether the writer belongs to
the belief space or not is unclear. We contend that one of the problems in
student essays is ambiguity; the reader can’t be sure what the writer is trying
to convey. Further, we argue that one way to reduce ambiguity in student essays
is to teach students how to identify the belief spaces in their texts. We use
the concept of belief spaces to discuss an ambiguous essay written by a student
on the subject of gay men. We also provide a copy of the assignment that we use
to teach the concept of belief spaces to basic writing students so that they
can use this method as a tool for revision.
Laurel
L. Bower
Student
Reflection and Critical Thinking: A Rhetorical Analysis of 88 Portfolio Cover
Letters
This research is an analysis of 88
first-year portfolio cover letters from the Spring 2000 English 102 Program
Assessment at the University of Nevada, Reno.
This analysis focuses on what these students viewed as the rhetorical
purposes of cover letters. The goal of this study was to apply the theories of
Aristotle, Toulmin, and Burke to these letters to analyze their appellate,
argumentative, and performative nature.
The results of the study suggest that, while a majority of the student
writers reviewed what they had learned, offered support for portfolio choices,
and supplied information about learning, they did not often reach a level that
demonstrated metacognitive ability by examining assumptions about writing and
thinking. It is possible that the genre
of the portfolio cover letter and its role in reflection need to be reexamined
and redefined.
Paul
Kei Matsuda
Basic
Writing and Second Language Writers: Toward an Inclusive Definition
Defining basic writers is becoming
increasingly complex as the linguistic and cultural diversity of the college
student population continues to intensify. Because the definition of basic
writers influences whose needs are considered and whose needs are not, it is
important to examine how basic writers are conceptualized in the disciplinary
practices of basic writing. This historical article documents how the presence
of second language writers has been reflected—or not reflected—in the
definition of basic writers over the last four decades and highlights the
importance of defining basic writers in ways that include all students who are
subject to the disciplinary and instructional practices of basic writing.
Integrating
Reading and Writing: A Response to the Basic Writing “Crisis”
This article describes a FIPSE-funded integrated reading/writing program developed at San Francisco State University in response to the latest basic writing “crisis.” After noting the theoretical and practical necessity for integrating reading and writing, the authors provide a detailed account of the program and report on its first year of implementation. They conclude by offering some valuable lessons learned from this experience.