Journal of Basic Writing


Volume 20 Issue 1, Spring 2001

 

Table of Contents

 

·        Laurie Grobman,  “(Re)Writing Youth: Basic Writing, Youth Culture, and Social Change”

·        Ann Tabachnikov,  “The Mommification of Writing Instruction: A Tale of Two Students”

·        Raul Ybarra,  “Cultural Dissonance in Basic Writing Courses”

·        Wendy Ryden, “ How Soft is Process? The Feminization of Comp and Pedagogies of Care”

·        David C. Fletcher, “Tutors' Ideals and Practices”

·        Linda VonBergen,  “Shaping the Point With Poetry”

 

Cumulative Index  1997 - 2000


Journal of Basic Writing

Abstracts, volume 20 Issue 1, Spring 2001

Laurie Grobman

 “(Re)Writing Youth: Basic Writing, Youth Culture, and Social Change”
As an extension of Henry Giroux’s critique of mainstream media and popular culture’s depictions of young people, this article examines the ways in which students in basic writing respond to rhetorical constructions of their generation. It argues that compositionists’ efforts to intervene and mediate society’s conceptions of youth are complicated by students’ simultaneous acceptance and rejection of these representations and also explores the subsequent implications for students’ and teachers’ responsibility and complicity in society’s “demonization” of young people. Claiming that students in basic writing are uniquely situated to write across and against society’s definitions of them, the author suggests approaches to critical basic writing pedagogy that bring youth culture into its critique, paying particular attention to public writing.
 

Ann Tabachnikov

“The Mommification of Writing Instruction: A Tale of Two Students”
The questions explored in this paper grow out of a long career in the teaching of composition, and out of relationships with literally thousands of students.  Centering on two allows an especially complex dimension of such relationships to be treated with some necessary personal depth.  The issue of teacher as mother is with most of us, students and teachers alike, from the first moment we set foot in a classroom. Indeed, the issue of mother as teacher—and, by extension, woman as nearly everyone’s first teacher—is one that has abided with us for as long as humans have abided as a race.  The personal way in which this picture of woman as primal teacher speaks to so many of us in composition may not abide for as long, but is in no danger just now—for good or ill—of fading.
 

Raul Ybarra

“Cultural Dissonance in Basic Writing Courses”
Understanding why Latino students do poorly in writing courses is becoming an ever more important issue because Latinos are the fastest growing group in the United States.    Although we can account for some of the reasons for the high dropout rates of Latinos, we still do not understand the majority of the factors.  These statistical realities of Latino student concerns warrant serious investigations.  Indeed, the prevalence of failure among Latino students in particular in Basic Writing courses suggests a (dis)connection—or dissonance—between the cultural backgrounds and corresponding thought processes of Latino students in the composition classroom.   To date, research in this area is virtually nonexistent.  Thus, an intensive case study using ethnographic techniques was carried out to understand how teaching affects nonmainstream students, particularly Latinos. Understanding, and consequently overcoming, this problem is key to reversing the low retention rates of Latinos in the U.S.
 

Wendy Ryden

“How Soft is Process? The Feminization of Comp and Pedagogies of Care”
This article is essentially a narrative using the metaphors of “hard” and “soft” to raise and discuss questions about pedagogy and the institutional settings of college writing instruction. The author analyzes transformations that have occurred in her teaching practices in relation to the feminization of composition and an “ethic of care.”
 

David C. Fletcher

 “Tutors' Ideals and Practices”
This case study of two college tutors demonstrates the importance for writing instructors and tutors to engage in collaborative reflection to identify and examine their frame of reference, including their assumptions, beliefs, values and practices. An important finding was that the tutors’ interpretation of writing instructors’ authority influenced significantly how they translated their ideals into practices and had a clear influence on how tutors allowed student writers ownership of their texts.  Consequently, for both writing instructors and tutors, central to their collaborative reflections is the question of the extent to which they support basic writers to become independent and authoritative writers and college students.
 

Linda VonBergen

“Shaping the Point With Poetry”
Although basic writers in first-semester composition courses progress to expository and argumentative writing, they may begin the semester with a personal narrative.  This assignment serves as a bridge into college writing since these students already have a variety of experiences about which they can write.  However, there are two possible problems with the personal story: lacking structure, the writer occasionally fails to make a point in the narrative; using the expressive aim of discourse, the writer may also obfuscate the point with emotional, connotative language.  To improve student narratives, this article borrows a rhetorical device from Isocrates, imitation, then combines it with the descriptive structure of Liva Polanyi and the referential (rather than expressive) aim of discourse from James Kinneavy.  Students imitate the structure of a brief poem, and they use the referential aim of discourse for clarity.  Writing precisely and making a point, students are preparing for academic discourse.