![[horizontal rule]](rsphr.gif)
| Effective: 4/18/1979 |
Revised: 3/1/2006 |
![[ASU logo]](asu.gif) |
RSP 201–03: Human
Subjects in Research—Exemption and Expedited
Review |
![[horizontal rule]](rsphr.gif)
Purpose
To identify exempt categories and allow expedited review of
research activities that may not require full committee review
![[horizontal rule]](rsphr.gif)
Sources
45 Code of Federal Regulations § 46
(2005)
The National Commission for the Protection of Human
Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont
Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of
Human Subjects of Research, April 18, 1979
![[horizontal rule]](rsphr.gif)
Policy
All research projects
that involve human subjects
must be submitted to the Research Compliance Office for review by
the ASU Human Subjects Institutional
Review Board (IRB). Some research may be exempt from full
committee review or may qualify for expedited review, according to
federal guidelines.
Laws, regulations, policies and procedures, The Belmont
Report, and pertinent information such as periodicals,
newsletters, and books are maintained in the Research Compliance
Office for researchers to use.
Exempt
Categories
Investigators should use
the Application for Exempt Research for
research projects that fall under any exempt category as defined by
45 Code of Federal Regulations 46.101 (b). No studies
involving vulnerable populations may be classified as exempt from
review. The IRB may classify research activities as exempt from
review if the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or
more of the following categories:
- Research conducted in established or commonly accepted
educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such
as:
- research on regular and special education instructional
strategies
or
- research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among
instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management
methods.
- Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive,
diagnostic, aptitude, or achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures, or observation of public behavior unless:
- information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human
subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked
to the subjects
and
- any disclosure of the human subjects’ responses outside
the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of
criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’
financial standing, employability, or reputation.
| Note: |
Questionnaires should be accompanied by a cover letter advising
potential subjects that their participation is voluntary and that
their privacy will not be violated. A sample of an appropriate
cover letter is available from the Research Compliance
Office. |
- Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive,
diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview
procedures, or observation of public behavior, if:
- the human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or
candidates for public office
or
- federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the
confidentiality of the personally identifiable information
will be maintained throughout the research and
thereafter.
| Note: |
Questionnaires should be accompanied by a cover letter advising
potential subjects that their participation is voluntary and that
their privacy will not be violated. A sample of an appropriate
cover letter is available from the Research Compliance
Office. |
- Research involving the collection or study of existing data,
documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic
specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the
information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that
subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers
linked to the subjects.
- Research and demonstration projects that are conducted by or
subject to the approval of department of agency heads, and that are
designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine:
- public benefit or service programs
- procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those
programs
- possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or
procedures
or
- possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits
or services under those programs.
- Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance
studies, if:
- wholesome foods without additives are consumed
or
- a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below
the level for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or
environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe,
by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection
Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Expedited
Review
The IRB may use an expedited review procedure for research
activities that present no more than minimal risk to human subjects and
involve only procedures in one or more of the categories listed
below.
- Clinical studies of drugs and medical devices only when:
- research on drugs for which an investigational new drug
application is not required
or
- research on medical devices for which:
- an investigational device exemption application is not required
or
- the medical device is cleared/approved for marketing and the
medical device is being used in accordance with its
cleared/approved labeling.
- Collection of blood samples by finger stick, heel stick, ear
stick, or venipuncture as follows:
- not more than 550 ml in an eight-week period from healthy,
nonpregnant adults who weigh at least 110 pounds; collection may
not occur more frequently than two times per week
or
- not more than the lesser of 50 ml or 3 ml per kg in an
eight-week period from other adults and children considering age,
weight, and health of the subjects, the collection procedure, the
amount of blood to be collected, and the frequency with which it
will be collected; collection may not occur more frequently than
two times per week.
- Prospective collection of biological specimens for research
purposes by noninvasive means including:
- hair and nail clippings in a nondisfiguring manner
- deciduous teeth at time of exfoliation or if routine patient
care indicates a need for extraction
- permanent teeth if routine patient care indicates a need for
extraction
- excreta and external secretions including sweat
- uncannulated saliva collected either in an unstimulated fashion
or stimulated by chewing gumbase or wax or by applying a dilute
citric solution to the tongue
- placenta removed at delivery
- amniotic fluid obtained at the time of rupture of the membrane
prior to or during labor
- supra- and subgingival dental plaque and calculus, provided the
collection procedure is not more invasive than routine prophylactic
scaling of the teeth and the process is accomplished in accordance
with accepted prophylactic techniques
- mucosal and skin cells collected by buccal scraping or swab,
skin swab, or mouth washings
or
- sputum collected after saline mist
nebulization.
- Collection of data through noninvasive procedures (not
involving general anesthesia or sedation) routinely employed in
clinical practice, excluding procedures involving x-rays or
microwaves. Where medical devices are employed, they must be
cleared/approved for marketing. Studies intended to evaluate the
safety and effectiveness of the medical device are not generally
eligible for expedited review, including studies of cleared medical
devices for new indications. Examples include:
- physical sensors that are applied either to the surface of the
body or at a distance and do not involve input of significant
amounts of energy into the subject or an invasion of the
subject’s privacy
- weighing or testing sensory acuity
- magnetic resonance imaging
- electrocardiography, electroencephalography, thermography,
detection of naturally occurring radioactivity,
electroretinography, ultrasound, diagnostic infrared imaging,
Doppler blood flow, and echocardiography
or
- moderated exercise, muscular strength testing, body composition
assessment, and flexibility testing where appropriate given the
age, weight, and health of the individual.
- Research involving materials (data, documents, records, or
specimens) that have been collected or will be collected solely for
nonresearch purposes such as medical treatment or diagnosis. Some
research in this category may be exempt; this category refers only
to research that is not exempt.
- Collection of data from voice, video, digital, or image
recordings made for research purposes.
- Research on individual or group characteristics or behavior
(including, but not limited to, research on perception, cognition,
motivation, identity, language communication, cultural beliefs or
practices, and social behavior) or research employing survey,
interview, oral history, focus group, program evaluation, human
factors evaluation, or quality assurance methodologies. Some
research in this category may be exempt; this category refers only
to research that is not exempt.
- Continuing review of research previously approved by the
convened IRB where:
- the research is permanently closed to the enrollment of new
subjects
- all subjects have completed all research-related interventions
and
- the research remains active only for long-term follow-up of
subjects
or where
-
- no subjects have been enrolled and no additional risks have
been identified
or
- the remaining research activities are limited to data
analysis.
- Continuing review of research, not conducted under an
investigational new drug application or investigational device
exemption where categories two through eight above do not apply but
the IRB has determined and documented at a convened meeting that
the research involves no greater than minimal risk and no
additional risks have been identified.
The standard requirements for informed consent apply to projects
approved by the use of expedited review.
![[horizontal rule]](rsphr.gif)
Cross-References
For additional specific information, see:
- RSP 201–01, “Human
Subjects in Research—General”
- RSP 201–02, “Human
Subjects in Research—Application and Consent”
- RSP 201–04, “Human
Subjects in Research—Project Monitoring”
and
- RSP 201–05, “Human
Subjects in Research—Assurance of
Compliance.”
skip navigation bar
RSP manual |
ASU policies and procedures manuals | Search manuals |
RSP manual contact |
ORSPA Web site
Back to
Top
